3.8 Article

Lentivirally transduced dendritic cells as a tool for cancer immunotherapy

期刊

JOURNAL OF GENE MEDICINE
卷 5, 期 8, 页码 654-667

出版社

JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD
DOI: 10.1002/jgm.400

关键词

dendritic cell; lentivirus; immunotherapy; T helper cell; cytotoxic T cell

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Dendritic cells (DC) are the professional antigen-presenting cells of the immune system, fully equipped to prime naive T cells and thus essential components for cancer immunotherapy. Methods We tested the influence of several elements (cPPT, trip, WPRE, SIN) on the transduction efficiency of human DC. Human and murine DC were transduced with tNGFR-encoding lentiviruses to assess the effect of transduction on phenotype and function. Human DC were transduced with lentiviruses encoding huli80MAGE-A3 and murine DC with huIi80tOVA to test antigen presentation. Results A self-inactivating (SIN) lentiviral vector containing the trip element was most efficient in transducing human DC. The transduction of DC with trip/SIN tNGFR encoding lentiviral vectors at MOI 15 resulted in stable gene expression in up to 94.6% (murine) and 88.2% (human) of the mature DC, without perturbing viability, phenotype and function. Human huli80MAGE-A3-transduced DC were able to stimulate MAGE-A3-specific CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cell clones and could prime both MAGE-A3-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in vitro. Murine huIi80tOVA-transduced DC were able to present OVA peptides in the context of MHC class I and class II in vitro and induced a strong OVA-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte response in vivo, that was protective against subsequent challenge with OVA-expressing tumor cells. Conclusions We show that, using lentiviral vectors, efficient gene transfer in human and murine DC can be obtained and that these DC can elicit antigen-specific immune responses in vitro and in vivo. The composition of the transfer vector has a major impact on the transduction efficiency. Copyright (C) 2003 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据