4.6 Article

Evaluation of the Cost-Effectiveness of Electrical Stimulation Therapy for Pressure Ulcers in Spinal Cord Injury

期刊

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.12.038

关键词

Electric stimulation; Economics; Pressure ulcer; Rehabilitation; Spinal cord injuries

资金

  1. Ontario Neurotrauma Foundation
  2. Roseau provincial de recherche en adaptation-readaptation [2008-ONF-REPAR-601]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mittmann N, Chan BC, Craven BC, Isogai PK, Houghton P. Evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of electrical stimulation therapy for pressure ulcers in spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011;92:866-72. Objective: To evaluate the incremental cost-effectiveness of electrical stimulation (ES) plus standard wound care (SWC) as compared with SWC only in a spinal cord injury (SCI) population with grade III/IV pressure ulcers (PUs) from the public payer perspective. Design: A decision analytic model was constructed for a 1-year time horizon to determine the incremental cost-effectiveness of ES plus SWC to SWC in a cohort of participants with SCI and grade III/IV PUs. Model inputs for clinical probabilities were based on published literature. Model inputs, namely clinical probabilities and direct health system and medical resources were based on a randomized controlled trial of ES plus SWC versus SWC. Costs (Can $) included outpatient (clinic, home care, health professional) and inpatient management (surgery, complications). One way and probabilistic sensitivity (1000 Monte Carlo iterations) analyses were conducted. Setting: The perspective of this analysis is from a Canadian public health system payer. Participants: Model target population was an SCI cohort with grade III/IV PUs. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measure: Incremental cost per PU healed. Results: ES plus SWC were associated with better outcomes and lower costs. There was a 16.4% increase in the PUs healed and a cost savings of $224 at 1 year. ES plus SWC were thus considered a dominant economic comparator. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis resulted in economic dominance for ES plus SWC in 62%, with another 35% having incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of $50,000 or less per PU healed. The largest driver of the economic model was the percentage of PU healed with ES plus SWC. Conclusions: The addition of ES to SWC improved healing in grade III/IV PU and reduced costs in an SCI population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据