4.7 Article

A novel class of nonpeptidic biaryl inhibitors of human cathepsin K

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 46, 期 17, 页码 3709-3727

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jm0301078

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel series of nonpeptidic biaryl compounds was identified as potent and reversible inhibitors of cathepsin K. The P2-P3 amide bond of a known amino acetonitrile dipeptide 1 was replaced with a phenyl ring, thereby giving rise to this biaryl series that retained potency vs cathepsin K and showed an improved selectivity profile against other cathepsins. Structural modification within this series resulted in the identification of compound (R)-2, a potent human cathepsin K inhibitor (IC(50) = 3 nM) that is selective versus cathepsins B (IC(50) = 3950 nM), L (IC(50) = 3725 nM), and S (IC(50) = 2010 nM). In an in vitro assay involving rabbit osteoclasts and bovine bone, compound (R)-2 inhibited bone resorption with an IC(50) of 95 nM. It was shown that, unlike some peptidic nitrile inhibitors of cysteine proteases, the nitrile moiety of (R)-2 is not converted to the corresponding amide 3 by cathepsin K. This indicates that this class of nonpeptidic nitrile inhibitors is unlikely to be hydrolyzed by cysteine proteases. Furthermore, the inhibition of cathepsin K by compound (R)-2 was shown to be fully reversible and not observably time-dependent. To demonstrate the efficacy of compound (R)-2 in vivo, it was administered to ovariectomized (OVX) rhesus monkeys at 20 mg/kg, po once daily for 8 days, and a urinary marker of bone turnover, N-telopeptide of type I collagen (uNTx), was measured. During the eight-day dosing period, the mean reduction by compound (R)-2 in uNTx was 80% (p < 0.001). This demonstrates that inhibition of cathepsin K leads to an inhibition of this bone resorption marker in OVX rhesus monkeys and strongly suggests that inhibition of cathepsin K is a viable therapeutic approach for the treatment of osteoporosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据