4.6 Article

Effects of Tai Chi Intervention on Dual-Task Ability in Older Adults: A Pilot Study

期刊

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.09.566

关键词

Accidental falls; Aged; Attention; Rehabilitation

资金

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration
  2. Office of Research and Development
  3. Career Development Award [C3249V]
  4. Associate Investigator Award [E3133-H]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To determine if a 12-week program of Tai Chi that has been shown to reduce falls incidence in older adults would improve the ability to allocate attention to balance under dual-task conditions. Design: Pre-/posttest experimental research design. Setting: Movement studies research laboratory. Participants: Community dwelling older adults (N=15; range, 62-85y) participated in either Tai Chi training or health education classes (controls) for 12 weeks. Interventions: Participants in the Tai Chi group attended a twice-weekly, 1.5-hour class taught by an experienced instructor. The control group attended a biweekly, 1-hour class for lectures on health-related topics. Main Outcome Measures: Two-cognitive tasks (responding to auditory or visual stimulus as quickly as possible) were performed concurrently while maintaining static balance during the Sensory Organization Test (SOT) and while avoiding obstacles while walking. The percent change in performance C, relative to the single-task condition was calculated and defined as the dual-task cost. The dual-task cost was calculated for both the postural and cognitive measures. Results: There was no improvement in the performance of postural stability or cognitive task under dual-task conditions for the SOT for Tai Chi versus controls. There was no improvement in avoiding obstacles under dual-task conditions for Tai Chi versus controls. Conclusions: Contrary to our hypothesis, the findings of this study did not Support a benefit of Tai Chi on the ability to allocate attention to balance under dual-task conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据