4.7 Article

Therapeutic efficiency of rhenium-188-HEDP in human prostate cancer skeletal metastases

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 89, 期 4, 页码 625-629

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601158

关键词

rhenium-188-HEDP; prostate cancer; bone metastases; therapeutic efficiency

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rhenium-188-HEDP (Re-188-HEDP) is a new and attractive radiopharmaceutical for the treatment of metastatic bone pain. As a product of W-188/Re-188 generator, it is convenient for clinical therapeutic use with a short physical half-life of 16.9 h and a maximal beta-energy of 2.1 MeV. We investigated the effect of Re-188-HEDP on pain relief, analgesic intake and impairment of bone marrow function in 27 patients with bone metastases induced from prostate cancer. All patients were interviewed using a standardised set of questions before, and after therapy for 12 weeks. The patients were treated with 2700-3459 MBq of Re-188-HEDP. Blood samples were taken weekly for 12 weeks, and a blood count was performed. Patients described an improvement on the Karnofsky performance scale from 74 +/- 7 to 85 +/- 9% 12 weeks after therapy (P = 0.001). The pain score showed a maximum decrease from 44 +/- 18 to 27 +/- 20% in the third to the eight week after therapy (P = 0.009). Seventy-six percent of the patients described a pain relief without increase of analgesic intake. Twenty percent of the patients could discontinue their analgesics and were pain free. Mean platelet count decreased from (286 +/- 75)*10(3) mul(-1) to (215 +/- 92)*10(3) mul(-1), and mean leucocyte count from (7.7 +/- 1.5)*10(3) mul(-1) to (6.0 +/- 1.9)*10(3) mul(-1) in the second to the fourth week after therapy. The maximal differences between the values of platelets and leucocytes before and after therapy were not statistically significant (P = 0.021 and 0.094). In conclusion, Re-188-HEDP is an effective radiopharmaceutical used in the palliative treatment of metastatic bone pain in prostate cancer and shows minimal bone marrow toxicity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据