4.8 Article

Cardiac troponin I is associated with impaired hemodynamics, progressive left ventricular dysfunction, and increased mortality rates in advanced heart failure

期刊

CIRCULATION
卷 108, 期 7, 页码 833-838

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000084543.79097.34

关键词

hemodynamics; natriuretic peptides; mortality; heart failure; tests

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background-Cardiac troponin I (cTnI), a sensitive and specific marker of myocardial cell injury, is useful in diagnosing and assessing prognosis in acute coronary syndromes. Small studies report that cTnI is elevated in severe heart failure (HF) and may predict adverse outcomes. Methods and Results-The present study evaluated 238 patients with advanced HF referred for cardiac transplantation evaluation who had cTnI assay drawn at the time of initial presentation. Patients with acute myocardial infarction or myocarditis were excluded from analysis. cTnI was detectable (cTnIgreater than or equal to0.04 ng/mL) in serum of 117 patients (49.1%). Patients with detectable cTnI levels had significantly higher B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels (P<0.001) and more impaired hemodynamic profiles, including higher pulmonary wedge pressures (P=0.002) and lower cardiac indexes (P<0.0001). A significant correlation was found between detectable cTnI and progressive decline in ejection fraction over time. Furthermore, detectable cTnI was associated with increased mortality risk (RR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.22 to 3.43). After adjustment for other factors associated with adverse prognosis including age, sex, ejection fraction, and coronary artery disease, cTnI remained a significant predictor of death. cTnI used in conjunction with BNP further improved prognostic value. Conclusions-cTnI is associated with impaired hemodynamics, elevated BNP levels, and progressive left ventricular dysfunction in patients with HF. cTnI may be a novel, useful tool in identifying patients with HF who are at increased risk for progressive ventricular dysfunction and death.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据