4.5 Article

Anti-protozoal efficacy of medicinal herb extracts against Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum

期刊

VETERINARY PARASITOLOGY
卷 116, 期 1, 页码 7-14

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-4017(03)00154-7

关键词

medicinal herb extracts; Toxoplasma gondii; Neospora caninum; anti-protozoal

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this study was to determine whether alcohol extracts of herbs (Sophora flavescens Aiton, Sinomenium acutum (Thunb.) Rehder and E.H. Wilson, Pulsatilla koreana (Yabe ex Nakai) Nakai ex T. Mori, Ulmus macrocarpa Hance and Torilis japonica (Houtt.) DC.) from South Korea, possess in vitro anti-protozoal activity against cultures of Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum. These herbs have been used as human anti-parasitics in Asian countries for many years. Alcohol extracts of these herbs were serially diluted to final concentrations ranging from 625 to 19.5 ng/ml in media and added to wells containing either T gondii or N. caninum tachyzoites in equine dermal (ED) cells. Parasite growth inhibition was measured using H-3-uracil incorporation as compared to untreated controls. T japonica inhibited T gondii proliferation by 99.3, 95.5, 73.0 and 54.0% in the range from 156 to 19.5 ng/ml, and S. flavescens inhibited T gondii proliferation by 98.7, 83.0 and 27.2% in the range from 156 to 39 ng/ml. T japonica inhibited N. caninum proliferation by 97.8, 97.9, 85.3 and 46.4% in the range from 156 to 19.5 ng/ml. S. flavescens inhibited N. caninum proliferation by 98.6, 97.0, 69.5 and 14.0% in the range from 156 to 19.5 ng/ml. Toxicity to host cells was noted when concentrations of T japonica and S. flavescens exceeded 625 ng/ml. The herb extracts from S. acutum, Pulsatilla koreana, and U. macrocarpa also showed toxicity at higher levels but did not achieve the same inhibition effects at the lower concentrations against T gondii and N. caninum as T japonica and S. flavescens. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据