4.6 Article

p21/CDKN1A mediates negative regulation of transcription by p53

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 278, 期 35, 页码 32507-32516

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M212517200

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The tumor suppressor p53 regulates transcription positively and negatively, depending on the target gene. Whereas p53 induces transcription through direct interaction with promoter DNA, the mechanism of p53-mediated transcriptional repression is less well understood. Early reports described the alleviation of p53-mediated repression by inhibitors of apoptosis, suggesting that negative regulation of transcription might occur only in conjunction with programmed cell death. More recently, it has been proposed that certain genes, such as survivin, are repressed by direct association of p53 with their promoters, followed by recruitment of a repressor complex. We show here that p53-mediated negative regulation of transcription could occur independently of apoptosis. In contrast, the amino-terminal transactivation domain of p53 was required for negative regulation of transcription. Similarly, the p53 homologue p73 diminished the expression of survivin and stathmin, depending on its transactivation domain. Mutation of the putative p53 binding site within the survivin promoter did not impair its repression. These observations raised the hypothesis that activation of an effector gene might be required for repression by p53. Strikingly, when the p53-inducible p21/CDKN1A gene was deleted, p53 no longer repressed any one among 11 genes that it downregulates otherwise. Most of these genes were also repressed by ectopic p21 in the absence of p53. Overexpressed c-Myc reduced the transcription of p21/CDKN1A and impaired p53-mediated repression but did not abolish repression by ectopic p21. Taken together, these results strongly suggest that increased expression of p21/CDKN1A is necessary and sufficient for the negative regulation of gene expression by p53.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据