4.6 Article

Macropored microparticles with a core-shell architecture for oral delivery of biopharmaceuticals

期刊

ARCHIVES OF PHARMACAL RESEARCH
卷 41, 期 8, 页码 848-860

出版社

PHARMACEUTICAL SOC KOREA
DOI: 10.1007/s12272-018-1062-y

关键词

Oral delivery; Microparticles; Macropore; Digestive tract; pH

资金

  1. Bill AMP
  2. Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1061366]
  3. Alberta Innovates Technology Futures [AIF200900279]
  4. University of Alberta
  5. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1061366] Funding Source: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microparticles (MPs) have been extensively researched as a potential drug delivery vehicle. Here, we investigated the fabrication of MPs with pH-responsive macropores and evaluated their potential applicability in developing solid oral drug formulations. Our previous study showed that macropored MPs, made of Eudragit(A (R)) L100-55, could encapsulate 100 nm, 1 A mu m, and 4 A mu m sized fluorescent beads-model drugs that are mimicking vaccines, bacteria, and cells. In the present study, closed-pored MPs after freeze-drying were coated with a gastric soluble Eudragit(A (R)) EPO layer to protect MPs in the simulated pregastric environment. Subsequently, drug encapsulated MPs maintained their intact closed-pored structure in the simulated gastric environment and exhibited a rapid release in the simulated intestine environment. Our MP system was found to provide a significantly higher level of protection to the encapsulated lactase enzyme compared to the control sample (i.e. without using MPs). Real-time fluorescence microscopy analysis showed that macropored MPs released encapsulated drugs in a burst-release pattern and in a size-independent manner. This work shows that our proposed EPO-coated MPs with pH-responsive macropores can meet the challenges posed by the multiple physiological environments of the digestive tract and be used in developing highly effective solid oral drug/vaccine formulations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据