4.6 Article

Fluorine abundances in the Large Magellanic Cloud and ω Centauri:: Evidence for neutrino nucleosynthesis?

期刊

ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL
卷 126, 期 3, 页码 1305-1311

出版社

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/377023

关键词

galaxies : individual (Large Magellanic Cloud); globular clusters : individual (omega Centauri); nucleosynthesis; stars : abundances

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The behavior of fluorine with metallicity has not yet been probed in any stellar population. In this work, we present the first fluorine abundances measured outside of the Milky Way from a sample of red giants in the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC), as well the Galactic globular cluster omega Centauri. The fluorine abundances are derived from vibration-rotation transitions of HF using infrared spectra obtained with the Phoenix spectrograph on the Gemini South 8.1 m telescope. It is found that the abundance ratio of F/O declines as the oxygen abundance decreases. The values of F/O are especially low in the two omega Cen giants; this very low value of F/O probably indicates that F-19 synthesis in asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars is not the dominant source of fluorine in stellar populations. The observed decline in F/O with lower O abundances is in qualitative agreement with what is expected if F-19 is produced via H- and He-burning sequences in very massive stars, with this fluorine then ejected in high mass-loss rate Wolf-Rayet winds. A quantitative comparison of observations with this process awaits results from more detailed chemical evolution models incorporating the yields from Wolf-Rayet winds. Perhaps of more significance is the quantitative agreement between the Galactic and LMC results with predictions from models in which F-19 is produced from neutrino nucleosynthesis during core collapse in supernovae of Type II. The very low values of F/O in omega Cen are also in agreement with neutrino nucleosynthesis models if the peculiar '' star formation history of omega Cen, with two to four distinct episodes of star formation, is considered.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据