4.6 Article

Mechanical properties and biochemical activity of remineralizing resin-based Ca-PO4 cements

期刊

DENTAL MATERIALS
卷 19, 期 6, 页码 558-566

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00105-7

关键词

cements; calcium phosphate; hydroxyapatite; lining cements; bases; remineralization; resin-reinforced cements

资金

  1. NIDCR NIH HHS [DE11789, P50DE09332, DE13298] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives. This study examined strength and bioactive (remineralizing) properties of a powder/liquid formulation (Cement I) and a more practical two-paste formulation (Cement II) of a fluoride-releasing resin-based Ca-PO4 cement. Methods. For the remineralization potential, the dissolution of calcium, total ionic phosphate and fluoride from set cement specimens were determined in buffered saline and saliva-like solution (SLS). Artificial caries lesions were produced on coronal dentin of extracted human molars. On each tooth, two defined areas were coated, one with a composite resin (calcium-free control), the other with either Cement I or II After incubation in SLS, the mineral loss under the cement was analyzed by digitized microradiography and compared to that under the control. Results. The diametral tensile strength of Cement II of approximately 30 MPa after 24 h and 23 MPa after 4 weeks was 2 to 3 times higher than that of Cement I (ANOVA, t-test, p < 0.05). Calculations of the ion-activity products and Gibb's free energy from solution ion concentrations indicated a significant potential for the formation of fluor- and/or hydroxyapatite. Concurrently, both cements caused increases of 47% (Cement I) and 38% (Cement II) in the lesion mineral content over that underneath the corresponding controls. Significance. These in vitro results suggest that the stronger Cement H could serve as a restoration-supporting lining material and could remineralize dentin in areas where complete removal of carious tissue is contra-indicated. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. on behalf of Academy of Dental Materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据