4.6 Article

The phosphoinositide-3-kinase/Akt pathway mediates the transient increase in Nanog expression during differentiation of F9 cells

期刊

ARCHIVES OF PHARMACAL RESEARCH
卷 33, 期 7, 页码 1117-1125

出版社

PHARMACEUTICAL SOC KOREA
DOI: 10.1007/s12272-010-0719-y

关键词

Embryonic stem cells; Endoderm; F9 cells; Nanog; Phosphoinositide-3-kinase; Retinoic acid

资金

  1. Korean Science & Engineering Foundation (KOSEF) [R01-2005-000-10728-0]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [R01-2005-000-10728-0] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nanog is a key determinant that maintains self-renewal and pluripotency of embryonic stem cells and represses their differentiation to endoderm. In this study, we examined the regulation of Nanog expression by phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt pathway during retinoic acid (RA)-induced differentiation of F9 embryonic carcinoma cells. Nanog protein expression was transiently upregulated up to 6 h after RA treatment and then declined. In agreement, a murine Nanog promoter reporter assay revealed that promoter activity increased during early stage of differentiation, but decreased when F9 cells became fully differentiated. RA treatment of F9 cells also led to a transient and parallel increase in both Akt and glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta phosphorylations. Nanog expression was diminished in the early stage by LY294002, a PI3K inhibitor, but was not affected in the late stage despite considerable inhibition of Akt phosphorylation and endoderm marker expression by the inhibitor. These data suggest that RA-induced PI3K/Akt activation in the early stage of differentiation is required for Nanog expression, which becomes independent of PI3K/Akt signaling once the differentiation is established. Thus, Nanog expression appears to be differently regulated by the PI3K/Akt pathway depending on differentiation stage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据