4.8 Article

Regeneration of hepatocyte 'buds' in cirrhosis from intrabiliary stem cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY
卷 39, 期 3, 页码 357-364

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0168-8278(03)00309-X

关键词

progenitor cells; liver

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background/Aims: In massive hepatic necrosis, hepatic stem cells constitute a canal of Hering derived, cytokeratin 19 (CK19) positive 'ductular reaction' (DR). Whether DRs in cirrhosis are activated stem cells (so called 'buds') or biliary metaplasia of cholestatic, injured hepatocytes is still debated. We investigate derivation of intraseptal hepatocytes (ISHs) from DRs and from the biliary tree in cirrhosis. Methods: Explants of hepatitis B and C, alcohol, primary, biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis-related cirrhosis were examined. ISHs were quantified and their associations with DRs and cholestasis recorded. 3D-reconstruction of ISHs and nearby bile ducts was performed in blocks from hepatitis C and primary sclerosing cholangitis cirrhosis. Results: Seven hundred seventy five/830 (94%) ISHs were associated with CK19 positive DRs. ISHs without ductular reactions were more likely to show cholestatic features (P < 0.0001). In 3D, ISHs were seen to bud directly from the biliary tree. In summary: ISHs: (1) are usually associated with stem cell-like DRs; (2) are rarely cholestatic, leaving the associated DRs unexplained; and (3) are linked to the biliary tree in 3D. Dynamic proliferation rates in hepatitis C over time suggest that hepatocyte replication diminishes in late stages, with an associated activation of the biliary stem cell compartment. Conclusions: We therefore suggest that the biliary tree, from at least its smaller branches up to the canals of Hering, are composed of or at least harbor facultative hepatic stem cells, and that ISH largely represent 'buds' of newly formed hepatocytes. (C) 2003 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Association for the Study of the Liver.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据