4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Steric interactions mediated by multiblock polymers and biopolymers: role of block size and addition of hydrophilic side chains

期刊

COLLOIDS AND SURFACES B-BIOINTERFACES
卷 31, 期 1-4, 页码 195-206

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0927-7765(03)00140-1

关键词

steric stability; SCF calculations; protein-polysaccharide complexes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To a first approximation, the primary structure of many food proteins maybe thought of as a sequence of short hydrophobic and hydrophilic blocks. The influence of this type of structure on the steric-stabilising properties of such proteins has been considered here. In line with previous studies, using Self-Consistent-Field calculations, it has been shown that the presence of such protein molecules can lead to attraction and consequently bridging flocculation of colloidal particles. In the low adsorption energy limit for the hydrophobic groups (similar to -1k(B)T), it is found that the steric potential is significantly influenced by the changes in the number of adsorbed segments, as two surfaces are brought together. This is in contrast to the well-known results in the literature for the high adsorption limiting cases, where the number of such segments remains constant. In particular, the changes in the number of adsorbed hydrophobic units are observed not to be a monotonic function of the separation distance, but increase or decrease in reasonable accord with the oscillatory nature of the steric interactions, observed for various block sizes. Effects of the addition of a moderately sized hydrophilic side chain to the above molecules have also been studied. It is found that, in principle, such a modification can lead to a purely repulsive steric potential in solutions of these hybrid biopolymers. At the hydrophilic side chain sizes considered here, the surface affinity of the molecules is observed not to be drastically different compared to those of unmodified proteins. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据