4.8 Article

Hidden Markov random field model selection criteria based on mean field-like approximations

出版社

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2003.1227985

关键词

image segmentation; hidden Markov random fields; model selection; Bayesian Information Criterion; mean field; approximation; partition function

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hidden Markov random fields appear naturally in problems such as image segmentation, where an unknown class assignment has to be estimated from the observations at each pixel. Choosing the probabilistic model that best accounts for the observations is an important first step for the quality of the subsequent estimation and analysis. A commonly used selection criterion is the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) of Schwarz (1978), but for hidden Markov random fields, its exact computation is not tractable due to the dependence structure induced by the Markov model. We propose approximations of BIC based on the mean field principle of statistical physics. The mean field theory provides approximations of Markov random fields by systems of independent variables leading to tractable computations. Using this principle, we first derive a class of criteria by approximating the Markov distribution in the usual BIC expression as a penalized likelihood. We then rewrite BIC in terms of normalizing constants, also called partition functions, instead of Markov distributions. It enables us to use finer mean field approximations and to derive other criteria using optimal lower bounds for the normalizing constants. To illustrate the performance of our partition function-based approximation of BIC as a model selection criterion, we focus on the preliminary issue of choosing the number of classes before the segmentation task. Experiments on simulated and real data point out our criterion as promising: It takes spatial information into account through the Markov model and improves the results obtained with BIC for independent mixture models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据