4.5 Article

3-Nitrotyrosine immunoreactivity in olfactory receptor neurons of patients with Alzheimer's disease: implications for impaired odor sensitivity

期刊

NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING
卷 24, 期 5, 页码 663-673

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0197-4580(02)00195-1

关键词

free radicals; oxidative stress; olfactory threshold; aging; peroxynitrite

资金

  1. NIA NIH HHS [AG16345, P50-AG05144] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Olfactory sensory function is impaired in patients with the diagnosis of probable Alzheimer's disease (AD) compared to elderly controls, and the olfactory epithelium (OE) of AD patients exhibits several pathological changes characteristic of the AD brain. To confirm that the populations from whom our postmortem tissues are obtained exhibit similar decrements in sensory function, threshold testing was performed; probable AD patients had significantly higher olfactory thresholds than controls. To determine if oxidative stress contributes to decreased olfactory function in AD, we localized 3-nitrotyrosine (3-NT) immunoreactivity in OE obtained postmortem from patients with neuropathologically confirmed AD and age-matched controls with brains free of significant neurodegenerative pathology. In AD patients, immunoreactivity was localized in olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs), including dendritic knobs where ion channels that participate in sensory transduction are located, suggesting a direct mechanism for olfactory impairment. In controls, immunoreactivity occurred in blood vessel endothelium, suggesting age-related vascular dysfunction. Immunohistochemistry for CD68, a macrophage scavenger receptor, demonstrated activated macrophages, a source of free radicals contributing to 3-NT formation, in the OE of AD patients but not controls. These results demonstrate increased oxidative stress and modification of ORN proteins that may contribute directly to olfactory impairment in AD patients. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据