3.9 Article

Reduced Risks of Neural Tube Defects and Orofacial Clefts With Higher Diet Quality

期刊

ARCHIVES OF PEDIATRICS & ADOLESCENT MEDICINE
卷 166, 期 2, 页码 121-126

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.185

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [R01 NS050249, R03DE020112]
  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC 6U01-DD-000489, 1U01-DD-0006982]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To examine whether better maternal diet quality was associated with reduced risk for selected birth defects. Design: A multicenter, population-based case-control study, the National Birth Defects Prevention Study. Setting: Ten participating centers in the United States. Participants: Eligible subjects' estimated due dates were from October 1997 through December 2005. Telephone interviews were conducted with 72% of case and 67% of control mothers. Analyses included 936 cases with neural tube defects (NTDs), 2475 with orofacial clefts, and 6147 nonmalformed controls. Main Exposures: Food-frequency data were used to calculate the Mediterranean Diet Score (MDS) and Diet Quality Index (DQI), modeled after existing indices. Main Outcome Measure: Adjusted odds ratios (ORs). Results: After covariate adjustment, increasing diet quality based on either index was associated with reduced risks for the birth defects studied. The strongest association was between anencephaly and DQI; the OR for highest vs lowest quartile was 0.49 (95% CI, 0.31-0.75). The ORs for cleft lip with or without cleft palate and cleft palate and DQI were also notable (0.66[95% CI, 0.54-0.81] and 0.74 [95%CI, 0.56-0.96], respectively). Conclusions: Healthier maternal dietary patterns, as measured by diet quality scores, were associated with reduced risks of NTDs and clefts. These results suggest that dietary approaches could lead to further reduction in risks of major birth defects and complement existing efforts to fortify foods and encourage periconceptional multi-vitamin use.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据