3.9 Article

Use of Medical Imaging Procedures With Ionizing Radiation in Children A Population-Based Study

期刊

ARCHIVES OF PEDIATRICS & ADOLESCENT MEDICINE
卷 165, 期 5, 页码 458-464

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2010.270

关键词

-

资金

  1. Covidien
  2. GE Healthcare
  3. INVIA
  4. Philips Medical Systems
  5. Toshiba America Medical Systems
  6. National Institutes of Health [KL2 RR024157]
  7. Louis V. Gerstner Jr Scholars Program
  8. American Heart Association [10CRP2640075]
  9. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality [1K08HS018781-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To determine population-based rates of the use of diagnostic imaging procedures with ionizing radiation in children, stratified by age and sex. Design: Retrospective cohort analysis. Setting: All settings using imaging procedures with ionizing radiation. Patients: Individuals younger than 18 years, alive, and continuously enrolled in UnitedHealthcare between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2007, in 5 large US health care markets. Main Outcome Measures: Number and type of diagnostic imaging procedures using ionizing radiation in children. Results: A total of 355 088 children were identified; 436 711 imaging procedures using ionizing radiation were performed in 150 930 patients (42.5%). The highest rates of use were in children older than 10 years, with frequent use in infants younger than 2 years as well. Plain radiography accounted for 84.7% of imaging procedures performed. Computed tomographic scans-associated with substantially higher doses of radiation-were commonly used, accounting for 11.9% of all procedures during the study period. Overall, 7.9% of children received at least 1 computed tomographic scan and 3.5% received 2 or more, with computed tomographic scans of the head being the most frequent. Conclusions: Exposure to ionizing radiation from medical diagnostic imaging procedures may occur frequently among children. Efforts to optimize and ensure appropriate use of these procedures in the pediatric population should be encouraged.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据