4.5 Article

CD20-negative DLBCL transformation after rituximab treatment in follicular lymphoma:: a new case report and review of the literature

期刊

ANNALS OF HEMATOLOGY
卷 82, 期 9, 页码 585-588

出版社

SPRINGER-VERLAG
DOI: 10.1007/s00277-003-0694-1

关键词

rituximab; follicular lymphoma; CD20-negative DLBCL

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rituximab is a monoclonal antibody against the CD20 molecule which is used to treat B-cell lymphomas. In 60% of low-grade B lymphomas in which rituximab was effective at first, there was no clinical response in a second treatment and a few cases of follicular lymphomas (FL) with transformation to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) have been reported. We describe a new case and hypothesize about the mechanisms of transformation: a 52-year-old man, in follow-up during 8 years for FL, who after rituximab treatment and complete remission of FL showed progressive disease involving the liver and duodenal mucosa. Immunohistochemical and molecular studies were performed on paraffin-embedded tissue samples of lymph nodes, the small intestine, and liver tumors. After rituximab treatment, biopsies of a liver lesion and the small bowel both showed CD20-negative large B-cell lymphoma. Molecular study of the initial and relapse specimens shows a CDR2 IgH rearrangement with the same height and t14;18 (MBR). The rapid relapse with the same rearrangement of IgH seems to support the interpretation that the change of grade of lymphoma and loss of CD20 expression occurred before rituximab treatment. The existence of a varying proportion of a CD20-negative cell population in every B-cell lymphoma which does not respond to rituximab should therefore be considered. The reduction of CD20 expression could be a resistance mechanism to rituximab retreatment in DLBCL as a consequence of the progression of low-grade B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (B-NHL). It is necessary to perform new biopsies to evaluate CD20 expression in relapse or the progression of B-cell lymphoma after rituximab treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据