4.8 Article

Comparison and evaluation of empirical zone settling velocity parameters based on sludge volume index using a unified settling characteristics database

期刊

WATER RESEARCH
卷 37, 期 16, 页码 3821-3836

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0043-1354(03)00298-7

关键词

activated sludge; secondary settling tanks; sludge settling velocity; sludge volume index; solids flux theory; simulation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Over the past few decades classic and contemporary research on the process of secondary clarification in activated sludge plants has illuminated several aspects of the solids-flux theory which actually require a closer examination. Inter alia the most challenging and controversial part in the field has been the development of reliable models for the settling properties of the activated sludge in the settler. Numerous studies have been performed aiming at the evolvement of reliable mathematical formulas that would satisfactorily describe this behaviour, but no universally accepted solution seems to exist to date. That is mostly because different experimental conditions, sludge types and instrumentation have been employed, thus complicating the process of reaching a conclusive result. In order to bring theoretical and practical developments of secondary settling tank design and simulation closer together, a number of related tasks are addressed in this study by the use of an integrated and unified settling characteristics database. Several drawbacks and advantages of the methodologies published hitherto are examined on a universal basis and under the same assumptions in order to reveal artifacts that complicate the procedure of settling velocity estimation. It is suggested that universally accepted solutions may be feasible especially for design purposes. For simulation analysis real-time data of settling velocity should be tested rather than values derived from laboratory experiments which are shown to produce different results depending on the applied approach. In conclusion, an integrated database is proposed as a means for a more robust and universally accepted design procedure. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据