4.2 Review

Description of far-from-equilibrium processes by mean-field lattice gas models

期刊

ADVANCES IN PHYSICS
卷 52, 期 6, 页码 523-638

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00018730310001615932

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mean-field kinetic equations are a valuable tool to study the atomic dynamics and spin dynamics of simple lattice gas and Ising models. They can be derived from the microscopic master equation of the system and contain analytical expressions for kinetic coefficients and thermodynamic quantities which are usually introduced phenomenologically. We review several methods to obtain such equations, and discuss applications to the dynamics of order-disorder transitions, spinodal decomposition, and dendritic growth in the isothermal or chemical model. In the case of dendritic growth we show that the mean-field kinetic equations are equivalent to standard continuum equations for this problem and derive expressions for macroscopic quantities, e.g. the surface tension and kinetic coefficients, as functions of the microscopic order parameters. In spinodal decomposition, we focus our attention on the vacancy mechanism, which is a more faithful picture of diffusion in solids than the more widely examined exchange mechanism. We study the interfaces between an unstable mixture and a stable 'vapour' phase, and analyse surface modes that lead to specific surface patterns. For order-disorder transitions, studied in the framework of a repulsive two-sublattice model, we derive sets of coupled equations for the mean concentration (a conserved quantity) and for the occupational difference between the two sublattices emerging from the symmetry breaking due to ordering (non-conserved order parameter). These equations are applied to transport in the presence of ordered domains. Finally, we discuss the possibilities of improving the simple mean-field approximation by density functional theories and various forms of the dynamic pair approximation, including the path-probability method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据