4.7 Article

Preseasonal treatment with either omalizumab or an inhaled corticosteroid boost to prevent fall asthma exacerbations

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
卷 136, 期 6, 页码 1476-1485

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.09.008

关键词

Asthma; fall season; omalizumab; inhaled corticosteroid; asthma exacerbations; rhinovirus; IFN-alpha

资金

  1. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services [HHSN272200900052C, HHSN272201000052I]
  2. National Center for Research Resources
  3. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health [NCRR/NIH UL1TR000451, 1UL1RR025780, UL1TR000075, NCATS/NIH UL1 TR000154, UL1 TR000077-04, NCATS/NIH UL1TR000040, UL1TR000150, UL1TR001105, NIH NIAID 5R01AI098077, UM1AI109565]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Short-term targeted treatment can potentially prevent fall asthma exacerbations while limiting therapy exposure. Objective: We sought to compare (1) omalizumab with placebo and (2) omalizumab with an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) boost with regard to fall exacerbation rates when initiated 4 to 6 weeks before return to school. Methods: A 3-arm, randomized, double-blind, double placebo-controlled, multicenter clinical trial was conducted among inner-city asthmatic children aged 6 to 17 years with 1 or more recent exacerbations (clincaltrials.gov #NCT01430403). Guidelines-based therapy was continued over a 4- to 9-month run-in phase and a 4-month intervention phase. In a subset the effects of omalizumab on IFN-alpha responses to rhinovirus in PBMCs were examined. Results: Before the falls of 2012 and 2013, 727 children were enrolled, 513 were randomized, and 478 were analyzed. The fall exacerbation rate was significantly lower in the omalizumab versus placebo arms (11.3% vs 21.0%; odds ratio [OR], 0.48; 95% CI, 0.25-0.92), but there was no significant difference between omalizumab and ICS boost (8.4% vs 11.1%; OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.33-1.64). In a prespecified subgroup analysis, among participants with an exacerbation during the run-in phase, omalizumab was significantly more efficacious than both placebo (6.4% vs 36.3%; OR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.02-0.64) and ICS boost (2.0% vs 27.8%; OR, 0.05; 95% CI, 0.002-0.98). Omalizumab improved IFN-a responses to rhinovirus, and within the omalizumab group, greater IFN-a increases were associated with fewer exacerbations (OR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.01-0.88). Adverse events were rare and similar among arms. Conclusions: Adding omalizumab before return to school to ongoing guidelines-based care among inner-city youth reduces fall asthma exacerbations, particularly among those with a recent exacerbation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据