4.2 Article

Influence of the high-temperature firing step on high-rate plasma deposited silicon nitride films used as bulk passivating antireflection coatings on silicon solar cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF VACUUM SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY B
卷 21, 期 5, 页码 2123-2132

出版社

A V S AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1116/1.1609481

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The influence of a short high-temperature step, comparable to the so-called firing of the metallization on silicon solar cells, on properties of high-rate (>0.5 nm/s) plasma deposited silicon nitride (a-SINx :H) films has been investigated. These a-SiNx :H films are used as antireflection coating on multicrystalline silicon (mc-Si) solar cells and, after the firing process, they also induce hydrogen bulk passivation in the mc-Si. Three different types of remote plasma deposited a-SiNx :H films have been investigated: (i) expanding thermal plasma (ETP) deposited a-SiNx :H films from a N-2-SiH4 gas mixture, (ii) ETP deposited a-SiNx : H films from a NH3-SiH4 mixture, and (iii) microwave plasma deposited a-SiNx :H films from a NH3-SiH4 mixture. The atomic composition and optical and structural properties of the films have been studied before and after the high-temperature step by the combination of elastic recoil detection, spectroscopic ellipsometry, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. It has been observed that the high-temperature step can induce significant changes in hydrogen content, bonding types, mass density, and optical absorption of the films. These thermally induced effects are more enhanced for Si- than for N-rich films, which in some cases have a high thermal stability. Furthermore, the material properties and the influence of the high-temperature step have been related to the bulk passivation properties of the a-SiNx :H coated mc-Si solar cells. It is found that in particular the density and thermal stability of the a-SiNx :H films seem to be important for the degree of the bulk passivation obtained. (C) 2003 American Vacuum Society.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据