4.7 Article

Signals for death and differentiation:: a two-step mechanism for in vitro transformation of adult islets of Langerhans to duct epithelial structures

期刊

CELL DEATH AND DIFFERENTIATION
卷 10, 期 9, 页码 987-996

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401266

关键词

islets of Langerhans; ductal epithelium; apoptosis; differentiation; intracellular signal transduction pathways; diabetes; pancreatic cancer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phenotypic change of adult pancreatic islets has been implicated in the development of certain pancreatic cancers and in islet transplant failure. The aim of this study was to characterize intracellular events that mediate changes in adult islet phenotype. Using an in vitro islet-to-duct transformation model, canine islets were induced to undergo phenotypic transformation to duct-like epithelial structures through a two-stage process. Stage one was characterized by widespread islet cell apoptosis associated with the formation of cavitary spaces within the islets. During this stage, c-Jun N-terminal regulated kinase (JNK) and caspase-3 activities were elevated, while extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and Akt activities were decreased. The second stage of the process was characterized by an inversion in the balance in activity between these signal transduction pathways and by a concomitant decrease in apoptosis. The transformed islets were no longer immunoreactive for islet cell hormones, but expressed the duct epithelial cell marker CK-AE1/AE3. In contrast to islet cells, these duct epithelial cells were highly proliferative. To clarify the role of the identified changes in signal transduction events, we performed additional studies using pharmacological inhibitors of enzyme activity and demonstrated that inhibition of JNK and caspase-3 activity prevented cystic transformation. Our results indicate that the balance in signaling activity between ERK/Akt and JNK/ caspase-3 appears to be an important regulator of islet cell death and differentiation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据