4.5 Article

Signaling pathways for monocyte chemoattractant protein 1-mediated extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation

期刊

MOLECULAR PHARMACOLOGY
卷 64, 期 3, 页码 773-782

出版社

AMER SOC PHARMACOLOGY EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
DOI: 10.1124/mol.64.3.773

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) initiate diverse downstream signaling events in response to ligand stimulation, as rapid activation of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase ERK1 and ERK2. The chemokine monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) is the agonist for several chemokine receptors that belong to the GPCR superfamily, CCR2 being the most important. Stimulation of mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) by MCP-1 has been implicated in integrin activation and chemotaxis, but the molecular pathways downstream of the receptors remain unclear. To dissect the cascade of events leading to MAPK activation upon CCR2 receptor stimulation, several specific inhibitors and mutants of signal transduction proteins were used in monocytic cells endogenously expressing CCR2 and/or in human embryonic kidney-293 cells transfected with CCR2B receptors and epitope-tagged ERK1. We show that ERK activation by MCP-1 involves heterotrimeric G(i) protein subunits, protein kinase C, phosphoinositide-3-kinase, and Ras. On the other hand, the activity of cytosolic tyrosine kinases, epidermal growth factor receptor transactivation, or variations in intracellular calcium levels are not required for the mitogenic activation elicited by MCP-1. In addition, we find that internalization of CCR2B itself is not necessary for efficient MCP-1-induced activation of ERK, although a dynamin mutant partially inhibits ERK stimulation. These results suggest that different parallel pathways are being activated that lead to the full activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade and that internalization of other signaling proteins but not of the receptor is required for complete ERK activation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据