4.3 Article

Preliminary results on the influence of chemoradiation on apparent diffusion coefficients of primary rectal carcinoma measured by magnetic resonance imaging

期刊

STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE
卷 179, 期 9, 页码 641-+

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00066-003-1045-9

关键词

magnetic resonance imaging; apparent diffusion coefficient; rectum; neoplasms; chemoradiation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To study changes of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) inpatients with primary rectal carcinoma during a course of combined chemoradiation. Patients and Methods: Diffusion-weighted echo-planar imaging at 1.5 T was performed in patients (n = 8) with primary rectal carcinoma (cT3) undergoing preoperative chemoradiation. Mean tumor ADC values and ADC histograms were determined and compared weekly during the course of therapy. Surgical resection of the tumors enabled a correlation of ADC values with the pathologic classification. Results: In four patients tumor T-downstaging (ypT0-2) was observed, and in four patients no downstaging (ypT3) was seen. In all patients, ADC values were higher before onset of chemoradiation therapy compared to the end of chemoradiation. Separating the patients into two groups, a significant increase in ADC value during week 1 of therapy, followed by a steady decrease, was found for the therapy-responder group. In the nonresponder group, no initial increase of ADC values was observed. After the 1st week of therapy, ADC values were significantly tower in the nonresponder group during the remaining duration of therapy. Conclusion: With these preliminary results it could be shown that MR diffusion imaging is able to detect individual changes of tumor ADC values during the course of combined chemoradiation reflecting biological changes within the tumor tissue. Further studies will be necessary to prove the possible value of totally noninvasive ADC imaging on predicting therapy outcome.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据