3.8 Article

Adenovirus-mediated gene transfer to adult mouse cardiomyocytes is selectively influenced by culture medium

期刊

JOURNAL OF GENE MEDICINE
卷 5, 期 9, 页码 765-772

出版社

JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD
DOI: 10.1002/jgm.405

关键词

virus; myocytes; cell culture; coxsackie-adenovirus receptor; gene therapy

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL55006] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background As development of cardiac gene therapies progresses, virally mediated genetic manipulations in cultured cardiomyocytes has become an important experimental approach. While adenovirus (Ad)-mediated gene transfer to neonatal and adult rat cardiomyocytes is well established, viral transduction of cultured adult mouse cardiomyocytes (AMCM) has been more difficult. This study was designed to test the hypothesis that culture medium is a critical determinant of efficient gene transfer in AMCM. Methods AMCM from 8-week-old C57BL/6 mice were cultured in either minimum essential medium (MEM) or medium M199 and then infected with an Ad beta-galactosidase and transduction efficiency was quantified by cytochemistry and beta-galactosidase activity assay. Coxsackie-adenovirus receptor (CAR) levels and Ad binding were evaluated by immunocytochemistry in M199- vs. MEM-cultured AMCM. Results Our results demonstrated dramatic differences in efficiency of Ad-mediated gene transfer in AMCM cultured in MEM (90 +/- 8%) vs. M199). This difference was specific to AMCM, and was not observed in a (5 +/- 1.2% number of other cells including neonatal rat cardiomyocytes. The enhanced transduction in MEM was associated with increased levels of CAR and Ad binding in AMCM. Conclusions Culture medium has a profound effect on the efficiency of Ad-mediated gene transfer in AMCM, perhaps via differential effects on CAR expression. These findings have important implications for increasing numbers of studies that employ viral gene transfer in adult cardiomyocytes derived from mouse models of cardiac diseases. Copyright (C) 2003 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据