4.4 Article

Functional coupling between heterologously expressed dopamine D2 receptors and KCNQ channels

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER-VERLAG
DOI: 10.1007/s00424-003-1111-2

关键词

M-current; KCNQ channels; dopamine D-2 receptors; electrophysiology; Xenopus laevis oocytes; SH-SY5Y cells; quinpirole; Bordetella pertussis toxin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Activation of KCNQ potassium channels by stimulation of co-expressed dopamine D-2 receptors was studied electrophysiologically in Xenopus laevis oocytes and in mammalian cells. To address the specificity of the interaction between D-2-like receptors and KCNQ channels, combinations of KCNQ1-5 channels and D-2-like receptors (D-2L, D-3, and D-4) were investigated in Xenopus oocytes. Activation of either receptor with the selective D-2-like receptor agonist quinpirole (100 nM) stimulated all the KCNQ currents, independently of the subunit combination, indicating a common pathway of receptor-channel interaction. The KCNQ4 current was investigated in further detail and was increased by 19.9+/-1.6% (n=20) by D-2L receptor stimulation. The effect could be mimicked by injection of GTPgammaS and prevented by injection of Bordetella pertussis toxin, indicating that channel stimulation was mediated via a G protein of the G(alphai/o) subtype. Cells of the human neuroblastoma line SH-SY5Y were co-transfected transiently with KCNQ4 and D-2L receptors. Stimulation of D-2L receptors increased the KCNQ4 current (n=6) as determined in whole-cell patch-clamp recordings. The specificity of the dopaminergic activation of the KCNQ channels was confirmed by co-expression of other neuronal K+ channels (BK, K(V)1.1, and K(V)4.3) with the D-2L receptor in Xenopus oocytes. None of these K+ channels responded to stimulation of the D-2L receptor. In the mammalian brain, dopamine D-2 receptors and KCNQ channels co-localise postsynaptically in several brain regions, so modulation of neuronal excitability by dopamine release could in part be mediated via an effect on KCNQ channels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据