4.7 Article

Immunotherapy of tumors with vaccine based on quail homologous vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2

期刊

BLOOD
卷 102, 期 5, 页码 1815-1823

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2002-12-3772

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The breaking of immune tolerance of self-antigens associated with angiogenesis is an attractive approach to cancer therapy by active immunity. We used vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2) as a model antigen to explore the feasibility of the immunotherapy with a vaccine based on a xenogeneic homologous protein. To test this concept, we prepared a quail homologous VEGFR-2 protein vaccine (qVEGFR) based on quail VEGFR-2. At the same time, a protein vaccine based on the corresponding ligand-binding domain of mouse self-VEGFR-2 (mVEGFR) was also prepared and used as a control. We found that immunotherapy with qVEGFR was effective at protective and therapeutic antitumor immunity in several solid and hematopoietic tumor models in mice. Autoantibodies against mouse VEGFR-2 (Flk-1) were identified by Western blot analysis and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Anti-VEGFR antibody-producing B cells were detectable by ELISPOT Endothelial deposition of immunoglobulins developed within tumor. VEGF-mediated endothelial cell proliferation was inhibited in vitro by immunoglobulins from qVEGFR-immunized mice. Antitumor activity was caused by the adoptive transfer of the purified immunoglobulins. Antitumor activity and production of autoantibodies against Flk-1 could be abrogated by the depletion of CD4(+) T lymphocytes. Angiogenesis was apparently inhibited within the tumors, and the vascularization of alginate beads was also reduced. No marked toxicity was found in the immunized mice. The observations may provide a vaccine strategy for cancer therapy through the induction of autoimmunity against the growth factor receptor associated with angiogenesis in a cross-reaction with single xenogeneic homologous protein.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据