4.1 Article

Distribution of macroinvertebrate assemblages in the Azul-Quemquemtreu river basin, Patagonia, Argentina

期刊

出版社

SIR PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1080/00288330.2003.9517187

关键词

rivers; community; macroinvertebrates; environmental variables; discharge; Patagonia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Longitudinal and seasonal changes in physical and chemical variables, and macroinvertebrate community structure-function were examined in the Azul-Quemquemtreu river system in the subantarctic forest of Patagonia, Argentina. Patagonian mountain streams have a marked seasonal discharge pattern and may have high suspended sediment loads because of forestry and other land-use practices. The main physical differences among sites were in substrate size (boulder-pebble/ sand), mean width (3-37 m), discharge (<1-80 m(3) s(-1)), total alkalinity (275-1210 meq litre(-1)) and conductivity (31-137 muS cm(-1)). Species richness and Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera richness decreased from upstream sites to the mouth of the river system and were affected by land use. Macroinvertebrate assemblages were influenced by physical (substrate size, width, discharge, current velocity) and chemical (alkalinity and conductivity) variables, and mean density of macroinvertebrates was significantly higher at the Quemquemtreu sites than the Azul sites. Canonical Correspondence Analysis indicated that seasonal trends in macroinvertebrate community composition were related to changes in environmental characteristics of the river, especially water temperature and discharge. The composition of benthic communities in rivers of the Patagonian Andes largely reflect characteristics related to stream size, but factors at the reach scale best explain variation in abundance data. Collector-gatherers were the dominant functional feeding group at all sites. Faunas have similarities with those of New Zealand in taxonomic-functional composition, with a predominance of Chironomidae (Diptera), Leptophlebiidae (Ephemeroptera), and Gripopterygidae (Plecoptera).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据