4.3 Article Proceedings Paper

Optimizing antihypertensive treatment in clinical practice

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION
卷 16, 期 9, 页码 13S-17S

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/S0895-7061(03)00967-1

关键词

hypertension; diabetes; ischemic heart disease; antihypertensive therapy; beta-blockers

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hypertension affects approximately 50 million individuals in the United States (US) and approximately I billion individuals worldwide. Blood pressure (BP) reduction significantly lowers the risk of cardiovascular (CV) disease the most common cause of death in the US-yet only approximately one third of Americans with hypertension have their disease controlled to the minimum recommended level of <140/90 mm. Hg. Clinical trials such as the Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) study, and Treatment of Mild Hypertension Study (TOMHS) have shown that control of BP to targets of less than or equal to140/90 mm Hg reduces the likelihood of CV disease and improves quality of life. This appears to be true even in patients at high risk, such as those with diabetes. Furthermore, it has become increasingly recognized that multiple BP-lowering agents are usually necessary to achieve BP control (<140/90 mm Hg, or <130/80 mm Hg for patients with diabetes or chronic kidney disease). In fact, current hypertension guidelines clearly state that most hypertensive patients will require two or more agents, and recommend initiating treatment with two antihypertensive medications if the BP is >20/10 mm Hg above goal BP. A valuable class of drug in the management of hypertension, beta-blockers (betaB) play an important role-whether as initial agents or as add-on therapy. They are especially useful in hypertensive patients with certain comorbidities such as diabetes or heart failure, in patients post-myocardial infarction, or in those generally at high risk for coronary disease. This article explores the cardioprotective role of how OB may be used to optimize antihypertensive treatment. (C) 2003 American Journal of Hypertension, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据