4.5 Article

A novel liposome radiolabeling method using 99mTc-SNS/S complexes:: In vitro and in vivo evaluation

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
卷 92, 期 9, 页码 1893-1904

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1002/jps.10441

关键词

liposomes; technetium-99m; SNS/S complexes; radiolabeling; stability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Liposomes are important carriers for controlled drug release, for gene or antisense therapy, and for immunization. Radiolabeled liposomes can be used to evaluate the in vivo behavior of different liposome formulations, as well as for diagnostic imaging and radionuclide therapy. A novel method for radiolabeling liposomes with Tc-99m-SNS/S complexes is introduced. This labeling method can be applied to liposome radiolabeling with not only Tc-99m but also two therapeutic radionuclides, Re-186 and Re-188. Liposomes encapsulating glutathione (GSH) were studied for Tc-99m labeling. N,N-bis(2-mercaptoethyl)-N',N'-diethyl-ethylenediamine (BMEDA), N,N-bis(2-mercaptoethyl)-1-butylamine (BMBuA), and benzene thiol (BT) were investigated to make Tc-99m-BMEDA, Tc-99m-BMEDA + BT, Tc-99m-BMBuA, and Tc-99m-BMBuA + BT, for liposome labeling. The labeling efficiencies of Tc-99m-GSH liposomes were from 36.9 to 69.2%. After incubation in serum, Tc-99m-GSH liposomes labeled with Tc-99m-BMEDA or Tc-99m-BMEDA + BT had the best labeling stability of the formulations tested. Distribution studies after intravenous injection of Tc-99m-liposomes composed of distearoyl phosphatidylcholine (DSPC) and cholesterol had a slow blood clearance and a high spleen accumulation demonstrating the in vivo labeling stability of the radiolabeled liposomes. The 99mTc-liposomes have great potential as a radiopharmaceutical system for evaluating various kinds of liposomes with different lipid composition, for evaluating in advance a subsequent radionuclide therapy using Re-186 or Re-188 labeled liposomes and for diagnostic imaging. (C) 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc. and the American Pharmacists Association.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据