4.6 Article

Reduced efficacy of ganciclovir against porcine and baboon cytomegalovirus in pig-to-baboon xenotransplantation

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION
卷 3, 期 9, 页码 1057-1064

出版社

BLACKWELL MUNKSGAARD
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-6143.2003.00192.x

关键词

baboon; breeding; cidofovir; cytomegalovirus; foscarnet; ganciclovir; infection; leflunomide; pig; prophylaxis; resistance; transplantation; virus; xenotransplantation

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [5T32-AI07529-04, R01-AI43890, P01-AI45897] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In pig-to-baboon xenotransplantation, porcine cytomegalovirus (PCMV) causes viremia, consumptive coagulopathy, and tissue-invasive disease. Baboon cytomegalovirus (BCMV) is associated with invasive disease in xenograft recipients. The efficacy of prophylaxis with intravenous ganciclovir (GCV) was studied for prevention of PCMV and BCMV infections in pig-to baboon xenotransplantation. GCV prophylaxis did not alter the incidence of BCMV activation in recipients, but reduced the amount of virus in tissues (mean 8.38 x 10(2) vs. 3.24 x 10(5) copies/mug DNA without treatment) and prevented tissue-invasive infections. PCMV viral loads were unaltered by GCV prophylaxis (8.36 x 10(8) copies/mug DNA without prophylaxis vs. 1.20 x 10(9) copies/mug DNA with prophylaxis). In vitro, PCMV was relatively resistant to GCV [90% inhibitory concentration (IC90) of 10mum, IC50-3mum], acyclovir (100mum), and leflunomide (not achievable). Only cidofovir (IC90 1 mum) and foscarnet (IC90 100mum) might have therapeutic efficacy for PCMV in vivo in achievable concentrations, although these agents often carry significant toxicity in transplant recipients. GCV has limited activity against BCMV and no therapeutic efficacy against PCMV at standard doses in vivo. GCV and other antiviral agents have limited activities against PCMV in vitro. Breeding of PCMV-free xenograft donors may be necessary to prevent PCMV infections in clinical trials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据