3.9 Article

Resting Energy Expenditure in Adults With Sleep Disordered Breathing

期刊

ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY
卷 134, 期 12, 页码 1270-1275

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/archotol.134.12.1270

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Center for Research Resources, National Institutes of Health [KL2RR024130]
  2. Sleep Education and Research Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To examine the association between sleep disordered breathing severity and resting energy expenditure (REE). Design: Cross-sectional. Setting: University-based academic medical center. Participants: Two hundred twelve adults with signs or symptoms of sleep disordered breathing underwent medical history, physical examination, level I attended poly-somnography, and determination of REE using an indirect calorimeter. Main Outcome Measure: Mean REE. Results: Seventy-one percent (151 of 212) of the study population were male, and the mean (SD) age was 42.3 (12.6) years. The mean (SD) body mass index, calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared, was 28.3 (7.3). The mean (SD) apnea-hypopnea index was 25.4 (27.2), and the lowest oxygen saturation during the sleep study was 86.9% (9.5%). The mean (SD) REE was 1763 (417) kcal/d. Analysis of variance and univariate regression analysis showed an association between REE and several measures of sleep disordered breathing severity that persisted after adjustment for age, sex, and self-reported health status in multiple regression analysis. Only REE and the apnea-hypopnea index demonstrated an independent association after additional adjustment for body mass index (or body weight and height separately). This association did not differ between individuals with normal vs elevated body mass index. Conclusions: Sleep disordered breathing severity is associated with REE. Although this association is largely confounded by body weight, there is an independent association with the apnea-hypopnea index.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据