4.0 Article

Expression of cell-surface antigens in acute promyelocytic leukaemia

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S1521-6926(03)00042-2

关键词

APL immunophenotype; surrogate marker profile

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Acute promyelocytic leukaemia (APL) with M3 (or M3v) morphology is the only AML subtype to date for which morphology and immunophenotype agree. In other words, FAB M3 is interchangeable with a unique marker profile. More precisely, we have finally recognized a surrogate marker profile for leukaemia derived from the (15;17) translocation and expressing PML/RAR alpha transcripts. To present this as a new development may come as a surprise to many. After all, the antigen expression pattern of AML-M3 was well recognized for many years: absence or weak expression of HLA-DR, CD117, CD15, CD11b and CD34 in the context of a myeloid phenotype (CD33 and CD 13 expression) and frequently associated with moderate to high side-scatter appearance upon flow cytometric evaluation, depending upon the degree of granularity of the leukaemic cells. While partially correct, this established APL phenotype is both flawed and limited in its ability to distinguish APL from other AML subtypes, such as natural-killer-cell AML. Given the availability of phenotype-specific therapy for APL, such as all-trans retinoic acid or arsenic trioxide, failing to diagnose APL or misdiagnosing a case of AML with an APL-like phenotype will result in serious clinical consequences. Faced with this dilemma, we have recently performed a comprehensive immunophenotypic analysis of APL patients entered on Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group trials. Our results give diagnostic power to only three antigens, HLA-DR, CD I I a and CD 18, all of which are characteristically expressed at low levels by APL cells. Despite some significant antigenic differences (e.g. in CD34 expression), this surrogate marker profile for t(15;17) APL applies to both the M3 and the M3v FAB phenotypes and to all three isoforms of the PML/RAR alpha transcript.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据