4.2 Article

Variation among natural isolates of Neurospora on small spatial scales

期刊

MYCOLOGIA
卷 95, 期 5, 页码 809-819

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.2307/3762009

关键词

clonal and vegetative growth; colonization; ecology; het-c

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although species of Neurospora are among the most studied model organisms in genetics and biochemistry, basic questions remain with respect to their ecology and population biology. In this study, we sought to clarify relationships among individuals over a small spatial scale, toward assessing both local variation and mode of colonization. Isolates of Neurospora were collected after fires in the Florida Everglades (May 1999), where abundant colonies appeared on diverse plants, including grasses and woody shrubs. Colonies were sampled in a linear fashion from two adjacent scorched sugarcane stems at one site and from a burned woody shrub at a distant second site. Species and mating types were assigned based on crossing behavior. Variation at two loci, het-c and frq, was determined by direct sequencing of PCR products. The results demonstrated substantial within- and among-species variation on a small scale, with up to three species and six different haplotypes occurring on a single stem. In total, four species and more than 10 genetically distinct individuals (haplotypes) were present across the three stems, often with multiple individuals occupying the same position. A permutation analysis revealed that individuals were not distributed randomly and that adjacent nodes on cane stems were more likely than chance to be colonized by the same haplotype. This suggests that visible eruptions of conidia on burned plants reflect substantial vegetative mycelial spread through subsurface tissues after primary colonization. Results also revealed that adjacent isolates from a single plant can possess different functional alleles at het-c, an observation meaningful in the context of the proposed role of het-c in self recognition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据