4.4 Article

Immunological purification of rat precartilaginous stem cells and construction of the immortalized cell strain

期刊

ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY
卷 128, 期 11, 页码 1339-1344

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-008-0571-4

关键词

Precartilaginous stem cells; Immunological purification; Simian virus 40; Immortalization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Precartilaginous stem cells (PCSC) are adult stern cells that control limb growth of animals and can differentiate directionally. In a previous study, PCSC was reported to begin differentiating at the fifth passage; therefore, sufficient uni-phenotype PCSC cannot be harvested from primary cell culture. The purpose of this study was to examine whether simian virus 40 large T antigen gene (SV40Tag) could induce rat PCSC to immortalize. Immunomagnetic separation was used to isolate PCSC labeled with fibroblast growth factor receptor-3 (FGFR-3). Plasmid pCMVSV40T/PUR containing SV40Tag was transfected into PCSC by liposome transfection method. One anti-puromycin in cell clone was obtained, which was confirmed as FGFR-3 positive, and expanded to immortalized cell strain. Results from RT-PCR and immunocytochemistry demonstrated that SV40Tag was highly expressed at both mRNA and protein levels after stable transfection. The cells transfected with SV40Tag were expanded to immortalized cell strain, which could maintain its characteristics for 30 passages, named immortalized precartilaginous stem cells (IPCSC). IPCSC were short fusiform or triangular cells with two or three short axons. Immunocytochemistry results of FGFR-3 and Collagen 11 demonstrated that IPCSC retained the characteristics of PCSC and the high proliferation capability of IPCSC was confirmed by methyl thiazolyl tetrazolium assay. Therefore, we concluded that rat precartilaginous stem cells were purified and immortalized precartilaginous stern cell strain was established. It may provide a stable cell resource for basic research and cell transplantation therapies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据