4.2 Article

Thermotropic liquid-crystal line polymers containing five-membered heterocyclic groups. X. Relationships between structures of semirigid polyesters based on three disubstituted 2,5-diphenyl-1,3,4-thiadiazoles and thermotropic liquid-crystalline and optical properties

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pola.10818

关键词

polyester; 1,3,4-thiadiazole; differential scanning calorimetry (DSC); X-ray; liquid-crystalline polymers; optical property

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Thermotropic liquid-crystalline (LC) semirigid polyesters based on three terphenyl analogues of 1,3,4-thiadiazole (2,5-diphenyl-1,3,4-thiadiazole)s (DPTD) linking undecamethyleneoxy chain at different substituted positions were synthesized from three disubstituted (4,4'-, 3,4'-, and 3,3'-) dioxydiundecanols of DPTD and four diesters, and the relationships between polymer structures and LC and optical properties were investigated. DSC measurements, texture observations, and wide-angle X-ray analyses revealed that the polymers composed of DPTD moiety having a more linear molecular structure and 1,4-phenylene unit or short aliphatic chain tend to exhibit LC smectic C and/or A phases. The following observations were made: (1) the emergence of smectic C and/or A phases in all the polymers on the basis of 4,4'-disubstituted DPTD, (2) formation of enantiotropic smectic C and/or A phases in the polymers containing a 1,4-phenylene unit in the main chain, (3) formation of a more stable smectic C phase in the polymers having a short aliphatic [(CH2)(4)] chain, and (4) a decrease of the mesomorphic property of the polyesters in the order of 4,4'-DPTD > 3,4'-DPTD > 3,3'-DPTD. Solution and solid-state ultraviolet-visible and photoluminescent spectra indicated that all the polyesters display maximum absorbances and blue emissions arising from the DPTD moiety, whose peak maxima were shifted to lower wavelengths in the order of 4,4'-DPTD > 3,4'-DPTD > 3,3'-DPTD as well as the aforementioned LC property. (C) 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据