4.4 Article

Odontoblast-like cell differentiation and dentin formation induced with TGF-β1

期刊

ARCHIVES OF ORAL BIOLOGY
卷 56, 期 11, 页码 1221-1229

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2011.05.002

关键词

Dentin; Odontoblast; Growth factor; Tissue engineer; Scaffold

资金

  1. Nature Science Foundation of China [30801309]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To investigate the inductive potential of scaffold material combing with transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-beta 1), and to induce odontoblast differentiation and dentin formation from dental pulp cells both in vitro and in vivo. Methods: Primarily cultured dental pulp cells were used for MTT, ALP activity assay and Alizarin red staining in the presence of TGF-beta 1. Pelleted cells were put on the filters combining with or not with TGF-beta 1 and cultured in vitro or in vivo. The in vitro and in vivo cell response and tissue formation were analysed with Haematoxylin-Eosin (HE), transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and immunohistochemical staining. Results: TGF-beta 1 increased the mineralization and ALP activity of dental pulp cells as revealed by Alizarin red staining and ALP activity assay. After in vitro culture for 7 days, cells polarized in the TGF-beta 1 group and expressed dentin sialoprotein (DSP), osteopotin (OPN) and type I collagen (Col I). After in vivo transplantation for 7 days, columnar odontoblast formed on the surface of filter in experimental group, and tubular dentin expressing DSP formed after 3 months transplantation. Conclusion: It was concluded that TGF-beta 1 combining with transfilter could induce odontoblast differentiation and dentin formation. Our results implied that suitable substrate for the progenitors of odontoblast to anchor on and inductive signals to initiate the differentiation of odontoblast should be taken into consideration when designing scaffold material for inducing dentin tissue engineering. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据