4.4 Article

N-myc oncogene expression in neuroblastoma is driven by Sp1 and Sp3

期刊

MOLECULAR GENETICS AND METABOLISM
卷 80, 期 1-2, 页码 272-280

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/S1096-7192(03)00133-1

关键词

neuroblastoma; N-myc; Sp1; Sp3; NF-1

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA43503] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [NS34432] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Regulation of N-myc oncogene expression is an important determinant of the biological behavior of neuroblastoma. The N-myc promoter contains several potential binding sites for transcription factors of the Sp1 family. Mutation of a CT-box motif contained within a 26 bp region required for N-myc downregulation by retinoic acid decreased basal transcriptional activity and altered DNA-protein interactions of the promoter, while mutations flanking this motif did neither. On super-shift, this region was shown to recruit Sp1 and Sp3 transcription factor proteins, while a functionally significant CT-box mutation resulted in their replacement by NF-1 transcription factor. Lysates from Drosophila S2 cells expressing exogenous Sp1, Sp3, and NF-1 proteins were able to partially mimic gel shift complexes seen with neuroblastoma nuclear extract and either wild type or mutant probes. Transient transfections of S2 cells showed that both individually and together, Sp1 and Sp3 were able to trans-activate a wild type CT-box-driven luciferase reporter construct in a dose-dependent manner. Transfection of the wild type but not mutant CT-box oligonucleotide was able to decrease endogenous N-myc expression in neuroblastoma cells. Together these results suggest that the CT-box element serves a critically functional role, and in the basal state, allows for N-myc trans-activation by Sp1 and Sp3. Moreover when mutated, the CT-box may still function as a binding motif for alternate transcription factors such as NF-1 that can allow persistent N-myc expression. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据