4.4 Review

AGEing and osteoarthritis: a different perspective

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN RHEUMATOLOGY
卷 15, 期 5, 页码 616-622

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00002281-200309000-00016

关键词

advanced glycation end products; cartilage; collagen; chondrocyte; osteoarthritis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review Across the world, osteoarthritis is the most commonly occurring musculoskeletal disease of the elderly, affecting more than 25% of the population older than 60 years of age. By far the single greatest risk factor for the development of osteoarthritis is age, but a mechanism to explain this relation has not yet been identified. If such a mechanism is identified, this potentially also provides a novel target for osteoarthritis therapy. The identification of new therapeutic targets is of utmost importance, because a disease-modifying treatment for osteoarthritis is not available and, because of the graying of the population, the number of patients with osteoarthritis will continue to increase, which will pose an enormous social and economic burden on society. Recent findings Advanced glycation end products accumulate in human articular cartilage with increasing age, and affect biomechanical, biochemical, and cellular characteristics of the tissue. As an illustration, accumulation of advanced glycation end products increase cartilage stiffness and brittleness while decreasing the synthesis and degradation of cartilage matrix constituents. Articular cartilage becomes more prone to damage, and thus osteoarthritis, at elevated concentrations of advanced glycation end products. Summary The reviewed literature demonstrates that the age-related accumulation of advanced glycation end products in articular cartilage may provide a molecular mechanism capable of (at least in part) explaining the age-related increase in the incidence of osteoarthritis. This conclusion paves the way for new strategies to prevent or treat osteoarthritis via inhibition and/or reversal of this process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据