4.7 Article

Deoxycorticosterone upregulates PDS (Slc26a4) in mouse kidney -: Role of pendrin in mineralocorticoid-induced hypertension

期刊

HYPERTENSION
卷 42, 期 3, 页码 356-362

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000088321.67254.B7

关键词

acid-base equilibrium; hypertension, mineralocorticoid; anions; mice; ion transport

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK 52935] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pendrin is an anion exchanger expressed along the apical plasma membrane and apical cytoplasmic vesicles of type B and of non-A, non-B intercalated cells of the distal convoluted tubule, connecting tubule, and cortical collecting duct. Thus, Pds (Slc26a4) is a candidate gene for the putative apical anion-exchange process of the type B intercalated cell. Because apical anion exchange - mediated transport is upregulated with deoxycorticosterone pivalate (DOCP), we tested whether Pds mRNA and protein expression in mouse kidney were upregulated after administration of this aldosterone analogue by using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction as well as light and electron microscopic immunolocalization. In kidneys from DOCP-treated mice, Pds mRNA increased 60%, whereas pendrin protein expression in the apical plasma membrane increased 2-fold in non-A, non-B intercalated cells and increased 6-fold in type B cells. Because pendrin transports HCO3- and Cl-, we tested whether DOCP treatment unmasks abnormalities in acid-base or NaCl balance in Pds (-/-) mice. In the absence of DOCP, arterial pH, systolic blood pressure, and body weight were similar in Pds (-/-) and Pds (-/-) mice. After DOCP treatment, weight gain and hypertension were observed in Pds (+/+) but not in Pds (-/-) mice. Moreover, after DOCP administration, metabolic alkalosis was more severe in Pds (-/-) than Pds (+/+) mice. We conclude that pendrin is upregulated with aldosterone analogues and is critical in the pathogenesis of mineralocorticoid-induced hypertension and metabolic alkalosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据