4.4 Article

The molecular deposition of transgenically modified starch in the starch granule as imaged by functional microscopy

期刊

JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY
卷 143, 期 3, 页码 229-241

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2003.08.009

关键词

Solanum tuberosum; antisense suppression; starch granule; amylose; amylopectin; confocal laser scanning microscopy; environmental scanning electron microscopy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The molecular deposition of starch extracted from normal plants and transgenically modified potato lines was investigated using a combination of light microscopy, environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM) and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). ESEM permitted the detailed (10 nm) topographical analysis of starch granules in their hydrated state. CLSM could reveal internal molar deposition patterns of starch molecules. This was achieved by equimolar labelling of each starch molecule using the aminofluorophore 8-amino-1, 3,6-pyrenetrisulfonic acid (APTS). Starch extracted from tubers with low amylose contents (suppressed granule bound starch synthase, GBSS) showed very little APTS fluorescence and starch granules with low molecular weight amylopectin and/or high amylose contents showed high fluorescence. Growth ring structures were sharper in granules with normal or high amylose contents. High amylose granules showed a relatively even distribution in fluorescence while normal and low amylose granules had an intense fluorescence in the hilum indicating a high concentration of amylose in the centre of the granule. Antisense of the starch phosphorylating enzyme (GWD) resulted in low molecular weight amylopectin and small fissures in the granules. Starch granules with suppressed starch branching enzyme (SBE) had severe cracks and rough surfaces. Relationships between starch molecular structure, nano-scale crystalline arrangements and topographical-morphological features were estimated and discussed. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据