4.7 Article

The development and validation of a neuropathy- and foot ulcer-specific quality of life instrument

期刊

DIABETES CARE
卷 26, 期 9, 页码 2549-2555

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/diacare.26.9.2549

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE - The purpose of this study was to develop a questionnaire that measures patients perceptions of the impact of diabetic peripheral neuropathy and foot ulcers on their quality of life and to assess the psychometric properties Of this instrument in a sample of patients with varying severity and symptomatology of diabetic peripheral neuropathy. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - The neuropathy- and foot ulcer-specific quality OF life instrument (NeuroQoL), generated from interviews with patients with (n = 47) and without (n = 15) diabetic peripheral neuropathy, was administered to 418 consecutive patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (35% with foot ulcer history) attending either U.K. (n = 290) or U.S. (n = 128) diabetes centers. Psychometric tests of NeuroQoL included factor analyses and internal consistency of scales, a Series Of multivariate analyses were performed to establish its criterion, construct, and incremental validity. Results were compared with those obtained using the Short Form (SF)- 12 measure of health-related functioning. RESULTS - Factor analyses of NeuroQoL revealed three physical symptom measures and two psychosocial functioning measures with good reliability (alpha - 0.86-0.95). NeuroQoL Was more strongly associated with measures of neuropathic severity than SF-12, more fully mediated the relationship of diabetic peripheral neuropathy with overall quality of life, and significantly increased explained variance in overall quality of life over SF-12. CONCLUSIONS - NeuroQoL reliably captures the key dimensions of the patients' experience of diabetic peripheral neuropathy and is a valid tool for studying the impact of neuropathy and Foot ulceration on quality of life.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据