4.2 Article

Cerebral amyloild angiopathy: Pathogenesis and effects on the ageing and Alzheimer brain

期刊

NEUROLOGICAL RESEARCH
卷 25, 期 6, 页码 611-616

出版社

FOREFRONT PUBL GROUP
DOI: 10.1179/016164103101202057

关键词

cerebral amyloid angiopathy; Alzheimer's disease; cerebral hemorrhage; stroke; interstitial fluid; cerebrospinal fluid; perivascular spaces

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) is a feature of ageing and Alzheimer's disease (AD); it is also associated with intracerebral hemorrhage and stroke. Here, the pathogenesis of CAA and its effects on the brain are reviewed and the possible effects of CAA on therapies for Alzheimer's disease are evaluated. Tracer experiments in animals and observations on human brains suggest that peptides such as Abeta are eliminated along the peri-arterial interstitial fluid drainage pathways that are effectively the lymphatics of the brain. In CAA, Abeta becomes entrapped in drainage pathways in the walls of cerebral arteries, reflecting a failure of elimination of Abeta from the ageing brain. One consequence of failure in clearance of Abeta is accumulation of soluble and insoluble Abeta associated with cognitive decline in AD. Replacement of vascular smooth muscle cells by Abeta occurs in severe CAA with weakening of artery walls and increased risk of vessel rupture and intracerebral hemorrhage. Risk factors for CAA include mutations of the amyloid precursor protein (APP) gene and possession of the epsilon4 allele of apolipoprotein E There is also evidence that cerebrovascular disease may be a factor in the failure of elimination of Abeta along perivascular pathways in sporadic AD, this would link ageing in cerebral arteries with the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease. If therapeutic agents, including anti-Abeta antibodies, are to be used to eliminate Abeta in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease, the effects of CAA on the treatment and the effects of the treatment on the CAA need to be considered.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据