4.5 Article

Depression in assisted living - Results from a four-state study

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY
卷 11, 期 5, 页码 534-542

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajgp.11.5.534

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Assisted living is a rapidly-growing sector of long-term care, but little research has been done on depression in this setting. Using data from a large sample of assisted-living residents, the authors sought to 1) describe the prevalence of depression and depressive symptoms; 2) identify resident characteristics associated with depression; and 3) examine the relationship between depression and the rate of nursing home placement and mortality. Methods: A group of 2,0 78 residents age 65 and older were enrolled from 193 assisted-living facilities across four states (Florida, Maryland, New Jersey, and North Carolina). Residents were classified as depressed if their score on the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (CSDD) exceeded 7. Results: Using this criterion, 13% were depressed, and only 18% of those were on antidepressants. Over one-third of residents had symptoms of depression, such as anxious expression, rumination, or worrying, and 25% displayed sad voice, sad expression, or tearfulness. Depression was significantly associated with medical comorbidity, social withdrawal, psychosis, agitation, and length of residence in the facility. Depressed residents were discharged to nursing homes at 1.5 times the rate of nondepressed residents Rates of mortality were also higher for depressed residents, but only those with severe depression (CSDD >12) bad a statistically significant increased rate of death. Conclusion: The mission of assisted living is to help older adults retain autonomy, privacy, and quality of life in a personalized environment. Greater effort should be made to detect and treat depression in this setting, both to reduce suffering and prolong the resident's ability to remain in their preferred environment,

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据