4.5 Article

Novel PI 3-kinase-dependent mechanisms of trypanosome invasion and vacuole maturation

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE
卷 116, 期 17, 页码 3611-3622

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.00666

关键词

phosphatidylinositol; phagocytosis; invasion; Trypanosoma cruzi; maturation

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [R01 AI47960] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01 GM041890] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mammalian cell invasion by the protozoan parasite, Trypanosoma cruzi, is facilitated by the activation of host cell phosphatidylinositol 3 (PI 3)-kinases. We demonstrate that the well-characterized Ca2+-regulated lysosome-mediated parasite entry pathway is abolished by wortmannin pretreatment. In addition, we have characterized a novel route of T cruzi invasion unexpectedly revealed in the course of this study. For over a decade, targeted exocytosis of lysosomes at the host cell plasma membrane was considered as the primary mechanism for T cruzi entry into non-professional phagocytic cells. We now provide evidence that a significant fraction (50% or greater) of invading T cruzi trypomastigotes exploit an alternate actin-independent entry pathway that involves formation of a tightly associated host cell plasma membrane-derived vacuole enriched in the lipid products of class I PI 3-kinases, PtdInsP(3)/PtdIns(3,4)P-2- Initially devoid of lysosomal markers, the resultant parasite-containing vacuoles gradually acquire lysosome associated membrane protein 1 (lamp-1) and fluid phase endocytic tracer from the lysosomal compartment. In striking contrast to latex bead phagosomes, few T cruzi vacuoles associate with the early endosomal marker, EEA1 and the 'maturation' process becomes refractory to PI 3-kinase inhibition immediately following parasite internalization. Jointly, these data provide a new paradigm for T cruzi invasion of nonprofessional phagocytic cells and reveal a novel vacuole maturation process that appears to bypass the requirement for EEA1.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据