4.7 Article

Disruption of ergosterol biosynthesis confers resistance to amphotericin B in Candida lusitaniae

期刊

ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY
卷 47, 期 9, 页码 2717-2724

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.47.9.2717-2724.2003

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [R01 AI50438, P01 AI044975, R01 AI050438, P01 AI44975] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Candida lusitaniae is an emerging human pathogen that, unlike other fungal pathogens, frequently develops resistance to the commonly used antifungal agent amphotericin B. Amphotericin B is a member of the polyene class of antifungal drugs, which impair fungal cell membrane integrity. Here we analyzed mechanisms contributing to amphotericin B resistance in C lusitaniae. Sensitivity to polyenes in the related fungi Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Candida albicans requires the ergosterol biosynthetic gene ERG6. In an effort to understand the mechanisms contributing to amphotericin B resistance in C lusitaniae, we isolated the ERG6 gene and created a C lusitaniae erg6Delta strain. This mutant strain exhibited a growth defect, was resistant to amphotericin B, and was hypersensitive to other sterol inhibitors. Based on the similarities between the phenotypes of the erg6Delta mutant and clinical isolates of C lusitaniae resistant to amphotericin B, we analyzed ERG6 expression levels and ergosterol content in multiple clinical isolates. C. lusitaniae amphotericin B-resistant isolates were found to have increased levels of ERG6 transcript as well as reduced ergosterol content. These changes suggest that another gene in the ergosterol biosynthetic pathway could be mutated or misregulated. Further transcript analysis showed that expression of the ERG3 gene, which encodes C-5 sterol desaturase, was reduced in two amphotericin B-resistant isolates. Our findings reveal that mutation or altered expression of ergosterol biosynthetic genes can result in resistance to amphotericin B in C. lusitaniae.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据