4.7 Article

Inhibition of neuronal tetrodotoxin-sensitive Na+ channels by two spider toxins:: hainantoxin-III and hainantoxin-IV

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
卷 477, 期 1, 页码 1-7

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0014-2999(03)02190-3

关键词

spider toxin; dorsal ganglion neuron; Na+ current; patch-clamp, whole-cell

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hainantoxin-III and hainantoxin-IV, isolated from the venom of the Chinese bird spider Seleconosmia hainana, are neurotoxic peptides composed of 33-35 residues with three disulfide bonds. Using whole-cell patch-clamp technique, we investigated their action on ionic channels of adult rat dorsal root ganglion neurons. It was found that the two toxins did not affect Ca2+ channels (both high voltage activated and low voltage activated types) nor tetrodotoxin-resistant voltage-gated Na+ channels (VGSCs). However, hainantoxin-III and hainantoxin-IV strongly depressed the amplitude of tetrodotoxin-sensitive Na+ currents with IC50 values of 1.1 and 44.6 nM, respectively. Both hainantoxin-III (1 nM) and hainantoxin-IV (50 nM) caused a hyperpolarizing shift of about 10 mV in the voltage midpoint of steady-state Na+ channel inactivation, but they showed difference in the reprime kinetics of VGSCs: hainantoxin-III significantly decreased the recovery rate from inactivation at a prepulse potential of -80 mV while hainantoxin-IV did not do. It is interesting to note that similar to huwentoxin-IV, the two hainantoxins did not affect the activation and inactivation kinetics of Na+ currents and at a concentration of 1 muM they completely inhibited the slowing inactivation currents induced by BMK-I (toxin I from the scorpion Buthus martensi Karsch), a scorpion alpha-like toxin. The results indicate that hainantoxin-III and hainantoxin-IV are novel spider toxins and affect the mammal neural Na+ channels through a mechanism quite different from other spider toxins targeting the neural receptor site 3, such as delta-aractoxins and mu-agatoxins. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据