3.9 Article

The Spectrum of Retinal Diseases Caused by NR2E3 Mutations in Israeli and Palestinian Patients

期刊

ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
卷 127, 期 3, 页码 297-302

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2008.615

关键词

-

资金

  1. Chief Scientist Office of the Ministry of Health (Israel) [3000003241]
  2. Yedidut Research Grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: To evaluate the involvement of NR2E3 in inherited retinal degenerative diseases in the Israeli and Palestinian populations and to study phenotypic variability in patients who are homozygous for the same mutation. Methods: Patients from 35 families underwent clinical evaluation, including a full ophthalmologic examination and electroretinography. Genetic analyses included direct sequencing of polymerase chain reaction products and haplotype reconstruction. Results: We recruited 6 consanguineous Muslim families and 2 Jewish families with enhanced S-cone syndrome. Patients from 4 of the Muslim families were homozygous for the same NR2E3 mutation, c. 119-2A>C, but showed considerable variability in fundus appearance and retinal function, even among patients of comparable ages. Both Jewish patients were compound heterozygotes for the c. 932G>A mutation in combination with c. 194-202del9bp or a novel splice-site mutation, c. 747 + 1G>C. Homozygosity analysis in 27 consanguineous families with retinitis pigmentosa revealed a homozygous mutation, c. 932G>A, in 2 families. The electroretinographic responses in these patients were compatible with retinitis pigmentosa and did not show the characteristic enhanced S-cone syndrome pattern. Conclusion: Our results demonstrate the involvement of NR2E3 in enhanced S-cone syndrome and retinitis pigmentosa phenotypes in our populations. Clinical Relevance: Patients with NR2E3 mutations may manifest variable phenotypes. Moreover, patients who are homozygous for the same NR2E3 mutation have variable expression of retinal disease, suggesting the involvement of modifier genes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据